Every page of your tender pack, reviewed and cited in 24 hours.
AI tender analysis built for UK construction. Upload the pack and get a structured pre-construction review back the next morning, every finding cited to the source page.
Your pre-construction teams are expected to work through thousands of tender documents in tight timeframes, and there simply aren’t enough hours in the day to review them all properly.
TenderEase reads every page. Flagging the risks, clauses and gaps in information. It cites every finding to the source, and hands it all back within 24 hours.
What TenderEase does for your business
Launch the tender sooner
Get the bid moving on day one. Instead of waiting for someone to work through the pack before the team can start, you get a structured read straight away, so the tender launches sooner and you win back time at the front end where it counts.
The main points, summarised
Know the shape of the job in minutes: what the tender is, what's onerous, what's missing and what needs chasing, before you commit serious hours to pricing it.
Get the whole team across it, fast
The key information found, summarised and cited, so your estimators, commercial team and PM aren't each hunting through hundreds of documents for the clause, the date or the drawing that matters.
It frees your team, it doesn't replace them
TenderEase doesn't do the pre-construction teams job. It clears the groundwork so your people spend their expertise on the real risks and the commercial calls, instead of churning through hundreds of pages just to work out what they're dealing with.
Three steps.
No call required.
1
Upload your tender docs
Tender documents of any size. Drag and drop the lot through the secure uploader.
2
We read every page
A full review of the tender documents, with every finding cited back to the page from the source document it came from.
3
Dashboard delivered
Your completed dashboard arrives within 24 hours, as a password-gated link by email. Share it with your commercial team, estimators and trade subbies, all working from the same analysis.
The real dashboard. Cited, in full, in 24 hours.
What you receive.
AUDIO BRIEFING
The whole tender, talked through.
Every analysis comes with a spoken briefing: a clear walkthrough of the pack's key risks, programme, scope and actions. Put it on in the car on the way to site, or share it with the bid team so everyone arrives at the kick-off already across the detail, without anyone having to read 2,000 pages first. Not everyone has the time to sit and read a dashboard.
The audio briefing lets the wider team take in the tender hands-free, on the move or in the background, so the people who need the headlines get them without ploughing through the detail themselves.
Harmony Works, Sheffield - Tender Briefing
In this briefing
PROJECT LAUNCH DECK
The launch deck, ready before the kick-off.
Every analysis produces a ready-to-present Project Launch deck, so the kick-off can happen on day one instead of day five.
Normally a bid manager spends the first days of a tender reading through the pack, pulling out the key facts, the risks and the angles, then building a launch deck to take the rest of the pre-construction team through it. TenderEase does that part for you.
It's a starting point. Your bid manager edits and makes their own adjustments. The groundwork is simply already done.
TRUST & DATA SECURITY
Your tender. Your data. Handled properly
Handing over a live tender is a big ask. Here is exactly how TenderEase keeps it secure, and what happens to it afterwards.
Your pack is uploaded over a secure connection and stored encrypted, in transit and at rest.
Encrypted end to end
Every dashboard is password-gated. Only the people you share the link and password with can open it.
Access you control
Never used to train shared models
Your documents are analysed for your review only, never used to train anything other clients can access.
Yours to delete
Ask us to remove a pack and it is gone. Packs are deleted on request, with a clear retention period by default.
A published Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Data Processing Agreement sit behind the product. No offshore black box.
A registered UK company
If the analysis is not useful, tell us and we will put it right or refund you.
Backed by a guarantee
Need an NDA? We’ll sign yours.
Won't share a live tender without one in place? Send us your NDA, or use ours, and we'll have it signed before anything is uploaded.
Questions before you order? Email sales@tenderease.co.uk or book a short call. You will never be pushed onto one. Read our Privacy Policy, Terms of Service and Data Processing Agreement.
What we look for.
Every tender pack is different, but the risks hide in similar places. Here's a sample of what TenderEase surfaces on a typical tender pack. Included but not limited to the below.
-
The contractual traps that cost money when they're missed - uncapped liabilities, aggressive liquidated damages, unusual parent company guarantee requirements, onerous collateral warranty obligations, and payment terms that sit outside the Construction Act. We surface non-standard JCT and NEC amendments clause by clause, flagging anything materially different from the unamended form, and highlighting deletions as well as insertions.
For each risk, TenderEase goes further than flagging it. You get suggested control measures, practical ways to mitigate or push back during negotiation, the commercial opportunities a clause may create alongside its exposure, and the specific language your team could propose as an alternative. Every finding cites the exact clause number and page it came from. The analysis is a starting point for your commercial director, not a replacement for their judgement.
-
Every date that matters for pricing and delivery. Tender return deadline, clarification cut-off, interview dates, proposed start on site, sectional completion dates, practical completion, and any phasing requirements buried in the preliminaries. We pull long-lead items requiring early procurement decisions, liquidated damages rates per week of delay, and any milestones with specific performance obligations attached.
-
Every deliverable required at tender stage: method statements, programmes, CVs, case studies, insurance certificates, financial statements, quality plans, environmental policies, Modern Slavery declarations, and any project-specific questionnaires.
We flag the format required (signed PDF, Word, specific template), the person responsible for signing each, and any document that requires a sub-consultant or specialist supplier input.
-
Pre-construction information, principal designer arrangements, principal contractor duties under CDM 2015, and any Higher-Risk Building implications under the Building Safety Act 2022. We surface the client's residual designer duties, any existing F10 notifications, HSE correspondence referenced in the pack, and the Gateway stages that apply if the scheme falls within HRB scope.
-
The things that should match but don't, drawings that contradict the specification, schedules that contradict the prelims, room data sheets that contradict the finishes schedule, and employer's requirements that contradict the contract amendments.
Every inconsistency is surfaced with both sources cited, so your team can raise the right RFI before submission rather than carry the risk into the bid.
-
Areas where specification tightening, alternative products, or design simplification could meaningfully reduce cost.
We flag over-specified finishes, unusually prescriptive product references where equal-and-approved clauses would permit alternatives, repeated over-design in structural elements, and MEP specifications that exceed current regulatory minimums.
These are surfaced as opportunities, not recommendations, your team makes the call.
-
The ambiguities, contradictions, and missing information that should go back to the design team before the bid is submitted rather than after.
We draft the RFI in plain English, cite the page and document it relates to, and categorise it by urgency, clarifications needed to price, clarifications needed to programme, and clarifications that can be left to contract stage.
-
Full planning permission conditions, any S106 obligations, BNG (Biodiversity Net Gain) requirements, S278 highways agreements, S38 adoption requirements, S104 drainage agreements, party wall implications, and any listed building or conservation area constraints.
Each condition is surfaced with the trigger point (pre-commencement, pre-occupation, etc.), the discharging authority, and the document it sits in.
-
The logistics and sequencing factors a site team will need to think about, pulled together from what the pack surfaces. Access and site constraints mentioned across planning conditions, method statements, and employer's requirements; working-hour or environmental restrictions; neighbour and stakeholder sensitivities flagged in the documents; and programme phasing or handover requirements that will shape the build sequence.
-
Who is on the design team, who has been novated, and who is yours to appoint, all confirmed against the source. TenderEase checks the statutory position on planning, party wall and building control, and flags the specialist reports and strategies the project should have but the pack is missing, with an RFI ready to send.
Why not just use ChatGPT?
It's a fair question. Here's the honest answer.
-
Ask ChatGPT to find a planning application and it tells you where to look. TenderEase goes and gets it. It searches the planning portal for the documents tied to your project, downloads them, and loads them into the pack alongside everything else. It reads the site's surroundings from the map and flags the nearby establishments worth knowing about, the access constraints, busy frontages and sensitive neighbours that shape your logistics. These are tasks a chat window cannot run, only describe.
-
Generic AI knows a bit about everything. TenderEase knows JCT and NEC contracts, CDM duties, Building Safety Act obligations, and the way pre-construction teams actually work. Every section template has been shaped around the artefacts that appear in a real UK tender pack, not the general idea of a "document set".
-
Drop a folder into ChatGPT and it sees a pile of PDFs. Drop the same folder into TenderEase and it recognises prelims, specifications, ITT documents, drawings, schedules, contract amendments, planning conditions, and CDM information. Each document type is handled the way it needs to be handled, not processed uniformly.
-
TenderEase surfaces nothing it can't point to. Every commercial risk, every clause, every deadline links back to the exact document and page it came from, and a hallucination guard drops any claim the system cannot verify against the source. Generic AI summaries are take-it-or-leave-it. TenderEase findings are verifiable in one click.
-
Anyone can drop a document into ChatGPT. What you get back is a conversation on your screen, for you, that vanishes when the tab closes. TenderEase produces a structured, password-protected dashboard that your whole team can access, share with a client, or hand over to a subcontractor. Commercial, programme, CDM, buildability, RFIs, value engineering, planning conditions. Every analysis in the same sections, in the same order, ready to become part of how your team works, not a private conversation with an AI.
-
A 1,000-page pack has thousands of cross-references between drawings, specs, prelims, and schedules. TenderEase ingests the whole set, indexes it, and holds every piece of context at once. Generic AI loses information as the conversation grows. A clause on page 847 is still connected to the drawing on page 12.
-
TenderEase has been trained on real UK construction evidence, with section templates, risk patterns, and example findings curated by people who know how tendering actually works. The chased deadlines, the missed clauses, the questions that should have been asked sooner. That's the upper hand over a general-purpose tool: a product shaped by the industry it serves.
Every section template, every risk pattern, every example in TenderEase has been shaped by UK construction professionals who have lived the frustration of manual tender review - the chased deadlines, the missed clauses, the questions that should have been asked sooner.
That's the difference between a tool that guesses at what matters and one that knows.
Trained on the industry. Curated by the industry.
Got a tender pack?
Let’s see what it would cost.
Construction is an unforgiving industry. Margins are thin, contracts run for years, and a single tender misjudged at the outset can follow a company long after the job is won. The onerous clause nobody flagged, the scope that went unpriced, the risk that only surfaced in month three when it was already too late to price it. One bad job is sometimes all it takes to put real strain on an otherwise strong business.
We built TenderEase to combat exactly that. So a contractor can enter a contract and a project knowing precisely what they've taken on, with every page read and every risk on the table before the price goes in, not after.
Our team have spent years in UK pre-construction, on the receiving end of these packs, and TenderEase is the tool we always wanted on those jobs. It reads every page so nobody has to do it at midnight, and it shows its working, with every finding cited to the source, so you can check it rather than take it on faith.
We built it to make good teams faster and better protected, never to replace their judgement.